#53 closed defect (invalid)
license discrepancy
| Reported by: | guest | Owned by: | Sam Hocevar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
| Component: | core | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Product: | libcaca |
Description
Your web page states that you use the "Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License." Yet, the header file states the LGPL. So, which is it?
Change History (2)
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by
| Resolution: | → invalid |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 Changed 15 years ago by
| Component: | libcaca → core |
|---|---|
| Product: | → libcaca |
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
I suppose you are looking at an old version of libcaca such as 0.9, which was indeed licensed under the LGPL. Since then, an important relicensing effort took place and the library is now entirely under the WTFPL (see http://caca.zoy.org/list/msg00075.html).
Despite 0.9 being the latest "stable" release, people are strongly encouraged to use the more recent 0.99 technology previews.